Summary
The South Carolina Supreme Court held that a marina construction transaction involving out-of-state materials, navigable waterways, barges, and related interstate activities sufficiently affected interstate commerce for the Federal Arbitration Act to apply. The court held that the subcontractor’s mechanics’ lien and related claims were subject to the contract’s arbitration clause, and that the property owner could be joined in the arbitration under the contract’s joinder provisions. The court reversed and remanded, directing that the trial court proceedings be stayed pending arbitration.
Holdings
- The marina construction transaction involved interstate commerce and therefore fell within the Federal Arbitration Act.
- The contract's arbitration provision was enforceable according to its terms and encompassed the claims arising from the construction dispute.
- The mechanics' lien claim was subject to arbitration because it arose directly from and was dependent on the underlying construction-contract dispute.
- Although Wando E. was a nonsignatory and may lack independent standing to compel arbitration, it could be joined in the arbitration under the unambiguous contractual joinder provision because it was substantially involved in common questions of law or fact and its presence was required for complete relief.
- The order denying the motion to compel arbitration was immediately appealable.
Questions Presented
- Whether the marina construction transaction involved interstate commerce sufficient to bring the arbitration agreement within the Federal Arbitration Act.
- Whether the breach-of-contract and mechanics' lien claims fell within the scope of the parties' arbitration agreement.
- Whether Wando E., LLC, a nonsignatory to the contract, could participate in the arbitration through the contract's joinder provision.
- Whether the order denying the motion to compel arbitration was immediately appealable.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (34)
- Landers v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 402 S.C. 100, 108, 739 S.E.2d 209, 213 (2013)(followed)
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, 532 U.S. 105, 121 (2001)(followed)
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson, 513 U.S. 265, 274, 277-78 (1995)(followed)
- Perry v. Thomas, 482 U.S. 483, 490 (1987)(followed)
- Episcopal Hous. Corp. v. Fed. Ins. Co., 269 S.C. 631, 637, 239 S.E.2d 647, 650 (1977)(followed)
- United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459, 470 (4th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- United States v. Ballinger, 395 F.3d 1218, 1225-26 (11th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598, 609, 613 n.5 (2000)(followed)
- Zabinski v. Bright Acres Assocs., 346 S.C. 580, 591, 594-95, 597, 553 S.E.2d 110, 115, 117-18 (2001)(followed)
- Blanton v. Stathos, 351 S.C. 534, 540, 570 S.E.2d 565, 568 (Ct. App. 2002)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 34.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…