Summary
The Supreme Court of South Dakota affirmed the order vacating a sheriff's foreclosure sale and certificate of sale. The court held that the circuit court acted within its broad equitable discretion because the mortgagee's authorized bidder arrived late due to excusable circumstances and the property was sold for a grossly inadequate price.
Holdings
- A court may exercise its equitable discretion to vacate a foreclosure sale when the sale price is inadequate and the surrounding circumstances indicate mistake, misapprehension, or inadvertence by a party or interested bidder; mere inadequacy of consideration alone is insufficient.
- Fraud is not a necessary prerequisite to vacating a foreclosure sale when inadequacy of price is accompanied by mistake, misapprehension, or inadvertence and the equities otherwise justify relief.
- The circuit court did not abuse its discretion by vacating the sheriff's sale and certificate of sale.
Questions Presented
- Whether the circuit court abused its discretion by vacating the sheriff's sale and certificate of sale because the accepted price was inadequate and the mortgagee's representative's untimely arrival resulted from mistake, misapprehension, or inadvertence.
- Whether fraud or unfairness is required before a foreclosure sale may be set aside.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (7)
- Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. Fenske, 67 SD 236, 291 N.W. 596 (1940)(followed)
- Kirby v. Ramsey, 9 SD 197, 68 N.W. 328 (1896)(followed)
- State ex rel. White v. Brandt, 2008 SD 33, 748 N.W.2d 766 (2008)(followed)
- State ex rel. Kunz v. Campbell, 5 SD 636, 60 N.W. 32 (1894)(followed)
- Langeberg v. Perry, 62 SD 286, 252 N.W. 882 (1934)(limited)
- Stacy v. Smith, 9 SD 137, 68 N.W. 198 (1896)(followed)
- Johnson v. Jefferson Std. Life Ins. Co., 429 P.2d 474 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1967)(persuasive)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…