People ex rel. W.T.M.

2010 SD 26, 785 N.W.2d 264 · Supreme Court of South Dakota · June 16, 2010

Summary

The South Dakota Supreme Court reversed a juvenile delinquency adjudication based on alleged sexual contact under SDCL 22-22-7. The court held that the evidence, even viewed in the light most favorable to the State, did not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the juvenile acted with the specific intent to arouse or produce sexual gratification.

Holdings

  1. The evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that W.T.M. touched C.K. with the specific intent to arouse or produce sexual gratification.
  2. The juvenile court erred by adjudicating W.T.M. delinquent because the State failed to prove an essential element of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the evidence was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that W.T.M. acted with the specific intent to arouse or produce sexual gratification, as required for sexual contact under SDCL 22-22-7 and SDCL 22-22-7.1.

Disposition

reversed

Cases Cited (6)

  • In re J.H., 2008 SD 88, 756 N.W.2d 549(followed)
  • State v. Tofani, 2006 SD 63, 719 N.W.2d 391(followed)
  • In re W.Y.B., 515 N.W.2d 453 (S.D. 1994)(distinguished)
  • State v. Lovejoy, 464 N.W.2d 386 (N.D. 1990)(followed)
  • State v. Hilpipre, 395 N.W.2d 899 (Iowa Ct. App. 1986)(followed)
  • State v. Holzer, 2000 SD 75, 611 N.W.2d 647(distinguished)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…