Summary
The South Dakota Supreme Court reversed a juvenile delinquency adjudication based on alleged sexual contact under SDCL 22-22-7. The court held that the evidence, even viewed in the light most favorable to the State, did not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the juvenile acted with the specific intent to arouse or produce sexual gratification.
Holdings
- The evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that W.T.M. touched C.K. with the specific intent to arouse or produce sexual gratification.
- The juvenile court erred by adjudicating W.T.M. delinquent because the State failed to prove an essential element of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt.
Questions Presented
- Whether the evidence was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that W.T.M. acted with the specific intent to arouse or produce sexual gratification, as required for sexual contact under SDCL 22-22-7 and SDCL 22-22-7.1.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (6)
- In re J.H., 2008 SD 88, 756 N.W.2d 549(followed)
- State v. Tofani, 2006 SD 63, 719 N.W.2d 391(followed)
- In re W.Y.B., 515 N.W.2d 453 (S.D. 1994)(distinguished)
- State v. Lovejoy, 464 N.W.2d 386 (N.D. 1990)(followed)
- State v. Hilpipre, 395 N.W.2d 899 (Iowa Ct. App. 1986)(followed)
- State v. Holzer, 2000 SD 75, 611 N.W.2d 647(distinguished)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…