Summary
This document is a dissenting opinion from the denial of a petition for review in Frank Wheeler’s Arkansas criminal appeal. Associate Justice Rhonda K. Wood would have granted review to consider Wheeler’s double-jeopardy claim and to clarify the preservation of constitutional issues on appeal in light of Evans v. Harrison.
Questions Presented
- Whether Wheeler should be permitted to raise his double-jeopardy claim on appeal despite the preservation ruling applied by the court of appeals.
- Whether the Arkansas Supreme Court's decision in Evans v. Harrison changed or called into question the court's longstanding rule against considering constitutional arguments not preserved in the trial court.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (1)
- Evans v. Harrison, 2025 Ark. 164(questioned)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…