Summary
The Supreme Court of Florida sanctions Armando Arce for repeatedly filing frivolous or otherwise inappropriate pro se petitions concerning two Okaloosa County domestic relations cases. The Court directs its clerk to reject future filings by Arce relating to those cases unless signed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar.
Holdings
- Arce failed to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed because his extensive history of filing frivolous or otherwise inappropriate pro se petitions and requests for relief abused the Supreme Court's limited judicial resources.
- The Clerk of the Supreme Court must reject any future pleadings or other requests for relief submitted by Arce relating to the two specified case numbers unless the filings are signed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar.
Questions Presented
- Whether Arce's repeated pro se filings relating to his domestic-relations cases were frivolous or otherwise inappropriate and warranted sanctions.
- Whether the Supreme Court could restrict Arce's future filings concerning the two identified domestic-relations cases to filings signed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (20)
- In re Kinsey, 842 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 2003)(cited)
- Arce v. Chief Judge Timothy D. Osterhaus, No. SC2025-1811 (Fla. Jan. 16, 2026)(prior proceeding)
- Arce v. Arce, No. 1D2025-1602 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept. 24, 2025)(cited)
- Arce v. Arce, No. 1D2025-1404 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec. 18, 2025)(cited)
- Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989)(cited)
- Pettway v. McNeil, 987 So. 2d 20, 22 (Fla. 2008)(cited)
- Arce v. Arce, No. SC2024-1822 (Fla. Jan. 31, 2025)(cited)
- Arce v. Arce, No. SC2025-0771 (Fla. June 9, 2025)(cited)
- Arce v. Arce, No. SC2025-0706 (Fla. June 27, 2025)(cited)
- Arce v. Arce, No. SC2025-1055 (Fla. Aug. 12, 2025)(cited)
Showing top 10 of 20.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…