Gum v. Muddy Boyz Drywall LLC

2026 ND 5 · Supreme Court of North Dakota · January 15, 2026 · No. No. 20250324

Summary

The North Dakota Supreme Court dismissed Christopher Gum’s appeal because the district court had not entered a final judgment resolving all claims. Although Gum’s claims were dismissed on the merits, Muddy Boyz Drywall’s counterclaims were dismissed without prejudice, and no certification under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) was entered. The court concluded that the judgments were not final and appealable for purposes of appellate jurisdiction.

Holdings

  1. A party does not have a right to appeal from a judgment resolving fewer than all claims in a multi-claim action unless the judgment is otherwise appealable by statute or the district court properly certifies it under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b).
  2. A dismissal without prejudice generally is not appealable and, under the circumstances presented, did not make the judgment dismissing Gum's claims final or appealable.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Supreme Court had appellate jurisdiction over an appeal from a judgment dismissing Gum's claims when Muddy Boyz's counterclaims had been dismissed without prejudice but remained capable of being refiled.
  2. Whether the district court's judgments constituted a final judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) absent an express determination that there was no just reason for delay and an express direction for entry of judgment.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (11)

  • Gum v. Muddy Boyz Drywall LLC, 2025 ND 111, 22 N.W.3d 720(followed)
  • James Vault & Precast Co. v. B&B Hot Oil Serv., Inc., 2018 ND 63, ¶ 8, 908 N.W.2d 108(followed)
  • Morales v. Weatherford U.S., L.P., 2024 ND 81, ¶ 21, 6 N.W.3d 657(followed)
  • In re Estate of Hollingsworth, 2012 ND 16, ¶ 9, 809 N.W.2d 328(followed)
  • Investors Title Insurance Co. v. Herzig, 2010 ND 138, ¶ 24, 785 N.W.2d 863(followed)
  • Capps v. Weflen, 2013 ND 16, ¶ 7, 826 N.W.2d 605(followed)
  • Dixon v. Dixon, 2021 ND 94, ¶ 11, 960 N.W.2d 764(followed)
  • Conrad v. Wilkinson, 2017 ND 212, ¶ 5, 901 N.W.2d 348(followed)
  • Bell v. Pro Tune Plus, 2013 ND 147, ¶ 4, 835 N.W.2d 858(followed)
  • Triple Quest, Inc. v. Cleveland Gear Co., Inc., 2001 ND 101, ¶ 7, 627 N.W.2d 379(followed)

Showing top 10 of 11.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Supreme Court Of North Dakota Supreme Court Of North Dakota