Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department affirmed the denial of defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing a negligence claim arising from alleged bedbug bites suffered by an infant plaintiff. The court held that issues of fact existed regarding when defendants, who co-owned the premises, had notice of the bedbug condition and whether they failed to act.
Holdings
- Summary judgment was properly denied because issues of fact existed as to when and whether defendants had notice of the bedbug condition that allegedly injured the infant plaintiff.
- A party cannot obtain summary judgment merely by pointing to gaps in its adversary's proof.
Questions Presented
- Whether defendants were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the negligence cause of action when the record presented factual disputes concerning when and whether they had notice of the bedbug condition.
- Whether defendants established entitlement to summary judgment by identifying gaps in plaintiff's proof.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- Martinez v Contreras, 216 AD3d 532, 532 (1st Dept 2023)(followed)
- Miah v Pipe Dreams Realty V Corp., 214 AD3d 575, 576 (1st Dept 2023)(followed)
- Mohammed v Silverstein Props., Inc., 74 AD3d 453, 454 (1st Dept 2010)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…