Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed an order denying the defendants' motion for summary judgment because the motion papers lacked a word count certification. The court held that the omission should have been overlooked because no substantial right was prejudiced and remitted the matter for a determination on the merits.
Holdings
- A court should overlook the appellants' failure to submit a word count certification with their summary-judgment motion where no substantial right of any party was prejudiced.
- Because the Supreme Court did not consider the merits, the matter must be remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a new determination on the merits.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Supreme Court should have denied the appellants' summary-judgment motion solely because the motion papers lacked a word count certification.
- Whether the matter should be remitted for the Supreme Court to determine the merits of the summary-judgment motion after the procedural defect is overlooked.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (4)
- Bonas v. RRR & N Corp., 240 AD3d 851, 852(followed)
- Taveras v. Incorporated Vil. of Freeport, 225 AD3d 822, 823(followed)
- Anuchina v. Marine Transp. Logistics, Inc., 216 AD3d 1126, 1127(followed)
- Young v. City of New York, 164 AD3d 711, 713(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…