Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed an order designating Marvin Billinger a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act. The court held that the Supreme Court properly assessed risk-factor points and that Billinger failed to establish grounds for a downward departure based on his response to sex offender treatment.
Holdings
- The Supreme Court properly assessed the defendant 20 points under risk factor 13.
- A defendant seeking a downward departure must identify an appropriate mitigating factor not adequately taken into account by the Guidelines and establish the facts supporting that factor by a preponderance of the evidence.
- A defendant's response to sex-offender treatment may support a downward departure only when the response is exceptional, and the defendant did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that his response was exceptional.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Supreme Court properly assessed 20 points under SORA risk factor 13.
- Whether the defendant established a legally appropriate mitigating factor and the supporting facts necessary for a downward departure from the presumptive level three SORA risk designation.
- Whether the defendant demonstrated an exceptional response to sex-offender treatment warranting a downward departure.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (10)
- People v. Howell, 213 AD3d 708, 708(followed)
- People v. Bautista, 210 AD3d 1020, 1021(followed)
- People v. Gavalo, 235 AD3d 785, 786(followed)
- People v. Williams, 219 AD3d 763, 764(followed)
- People v. Hernandez, 236 AD3d 835, 836(followed)
- People v. Cousin, 209 AD3d 1047, 1048(followed)
- People v. Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 860(followed)
- People v. Coleman, 225 AD3d 792, 794(followed)
- People v. Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861(followed)
- People v. Stafford, 240 AD3d 718, 719(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…