Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed an order denying the plaintiff law firm's motion for summary judgment in an action to recover unpaid legal fees. Although the plaintiff established a prima facie entitlement to judgment on an account stated, the defendants' submissions raised a triable issue as to whether they timely objected to the invoices. The court held that summary judgment was therefore properly denied.
Holdings
- Although the plaintiff met its prima facie burden by showing receipt of the invoices and an apparent lack of objection, the defendants' opposing submissions raised a triable issue of fact concerning whether they objected to the invoices within a reasonable period; therefore, summary judgment was properly denied.
Questions Presented
- Whether the plaintiff established entitlement to summary judgment on its account-stated claim.
- Whether the defendants' submissions raised a triable issue of fact as to whether they objected to the invoices within a reasonable period.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- Michael B. Shulman & Assoc., P.C. v. Canzona, 201 AD3d 716, 717(followed)
- Citibank [South Dakota], N.A. v. Abraham, 138 AD3d 1053, 1056(followed)
- Legum v. Ruthen, 211 AD2d 701, 703(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…