Gorgia v. Dolan

Gorgia, 2026 NY Slip Op 03665 (Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division Second Judicial Department 2026) · Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department · June 10, 2026 · No. 2022-00751

Summary

The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed dismissal of claims brought by a former seminarian alleging employment discrimination, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and related causes of action against Catholic organizations and individuals. The court held that claims against the Pontifical North American College and one faculty member were properly dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction, while claims against the Archdiocese and Timothy Dolan were nonjusticiable because resolving them would require inquiry into religious doctrine and practice. The court also upheld denial of leave to amend because the plaintiff did not submit a proposed amended complaint.

Holdings

  1. The plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing of personal jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a)(1), (2), or (3) over the NAC and Harman, so dismissal of the specified claims against them for lack of personal jurisdiction was proper.
  2. The ADNY defendants waived their objection to late service of the complaint by retaining it without timely objecting and stipulating to extensions of time to answer.
  3. The claims against the ADNY defendants were properly dismissed under CPLR 3211(a)(2) because adjudicating whether plaintiff's progress in "human formation" was satisfactory would necessarily require an impermissible inquiry into religious doctrine or practice.
  4. The denial of leave to amend was proper because the plaintiff failed to submit a proposed amended complaint with the motion.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Supreme Court had personal jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a)(1), (2), or (3) over the Pontifical North American College and Peter Harman based on their alleged New York activities and Harman's communication with Timothy Dolan in New York.
  2. Whether the ADNY defendants waived their objection to late service of the complaint under CPLR 3012(b) by retaining the complaint and stipulating to extensions of time to answer without timely objecting under CPLR 2101(f).
  3. Whether the claims against the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York and Timothy Dolan were nonjusticiable under the First Amendment because resolving them would require an inquiry into religious doctrine or practice.
  4. Whether leave to amend was properly denied under CPLR 3025(b) because plaintiff failed to submit a proposed amended complaint.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (34)

  • Whitcraft v. Runyon, 123 AD3d 811, 812(followed)
  • Weitz v. Weitz, 85 AD3d 1153, 1153(followed)
  • Doe v. McCormack, 100 AD3d 685, 685(followed)
  • Peterson v. Spartan Indus., 33 NY2d 463, 466(followed)
  • Manning v. Budget Rent A Car, 241 AD3d 676, 678(followed)
  • Qudsi v. Larios, 173 AD3d 920, 922-923(followed)
  • Greenfader v. Chicago Sch. of Professional Psychology, 222 AD3d 845, 846-847(followed)
  • State of New York v. Vayu, Inc., 39 NY3d 330, 332(followed)
  • Aybar v. US Tires & Wheels of Queens, LLC, 211 AD3d 40, 48-49(followed)
  • Skutnik v. Messina, 178 AD3d 744, 745(followed)

Showing top 10 of 34.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…