Matter of Bartlett v. Perry

2026 NY Slip Op 00369 · Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department · January 28, 2026 · No. 2024-08755

Summary

The Appellate Division, Second Department affirmed a Family Court order modifying a custody stipulation and awarding the father sole legal and physical custody of the parties’ children. The court held that a sufficient change in circumstances supported modification and that the custody determination had a sound and substantial basis in the record.

Holdings

  1. A court-approved stipulation setting forth custody or parental-access terms may be modified only upon a showing of a sufficient change in circumstances such that modification is necessary to ensure the child's best interests and welfare.
  2. The paramount concern in determining custody is the children's best interests under the totality of the circumstances, and the award of sole legal and physical custody to the father was supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record.
  3. The mother was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel because her attorney provided meaningful representation.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the father established a sufficient change in circumstances warranting modification of the parties' court-approved custody stipulation.
  2. Whether awarding the father sole legal and physical custody served the children's best interests and was supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record.
  3. Whether the mother was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel in the Family Court proceeding.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (12)

  • Matter of Burke v Squires, 202 AD3d 784, 785(followed)
  • Matter of Fiore v Gima, 227 AD3d 1071, 1073(followed)
  • Matter of Shepherd v Mirukaj, 235 AD3d 769, 770(followed)
  • Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171(followed)
  • Matter of Freyer v Macruari, 234 AD3d 755, 756(followed)
  • Matter of Watling v Watling, 236 AD3d 1047, 1048(followed)
  • Sukul v Sukul, 196 AD3d 661, 663(followed)
  • Matter of Cadet v Lamour, 86 AD3d 538, 539(followed)
  • Matter of Brathwaite v Lightsey, 242 AD3d 883, 885(followed)
  • Matter of Clarke v Clarke, 222 AD3d 751, 752(followed)

Showing top 10 of 12.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…