Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed a Family Court order concerning petitions to modify custody and parental access. The court remitted the matter for an expedited hearing and a new determination, while directing the parties to continue complying with the existing order pending further determination.
Holdings
- New developments rendered the record insufficient to determine whether the Family Court's custody determination remained in the child's best interests.
- The court declined to express an opinion on the appropriate custody determination and remitted both petitions for an expedited hearing and a new determination.
Questions Presented
- Whether new developments rendered the appellate record insufficient to determine whether the Family Court's custody determination remained in the best interests of the child.
- Whether the Family Court custody order should be reversed and the parties' modification petitions remitted for an expedited hearing and new determination.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (6)
- Matter of Michael B., 80 NY2d 299, 318(followed)
- Haddad v Sassoon, 237 AD3d 673(followed)
- Matter of Martynchuk v Vasylkovska, 223 AD3d 819, 820(followed)
- Matter of Magana v Delph, 195 AD3d 720, 721-722(followed)
- Matter of Baker v James, 210 AD3d 676, 678(followed)
- Matter of Baptiste v Gregoire, 140 AD3d 746, 748(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…