Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed orders that sanctioned former counsel for the defendant in a divorce action and directed her to reimburse the plaintiff's counsel $1,375 in attorneys' fees. The court held that counsel properly executed and filed a consent to change attorney form under CPLR 321(b)(1), did not engage in frivolous conduct, and was not given a reasonable opportunity to be heard before sanctions were imposed.
Holdings
- The Supreme Court erred in imposing a sanction under 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 and ordering the former counsel to pay $1,375 in attorneys' fees because the record did not establish frivolous conduct.
- The Supreme Court erred independently because it did not provide the former counsel a reasonable opportunity to be heard before directing payment of costs.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Supreme Court properly imposed a sanction under 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 against the defendant's former counsel.
- Whether the Supreme Court properly ordered the former counsel to reimburse the plaintiff's counsel for attorneys' fees.
- Whether former counsel was required to move by order to show cause to be relieved as counsel after executing a consent to change attorney form under CPLR 321(b)(1).
- Whether the former counsel received a reasonable opportunity to be heard before costs were imposed.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (5)
- Matter of Fernandez v Nigro, 178 AD3d 703, 704-705(followed)
- Astrada v Archer, 71 AD3d 803, 807(followed)
- U.S. Bank N.A. v Tait, 234 AD3d 889, 892(followed)
- Matter of Cassini, 182 AD3d 13, 40-41(followed)
- Oppedisano v Oppedisano, 138 AD3d 1080, 1081(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…