Perchuk v. Narod

2026 NY Slip Op 03009 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026) · Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department · May 13, 2026 · No. 2024-09261; 2025-07644

Summary

The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed a judgment awarding Beth Johnston Perchuk $36,000 in damages for breach of a partnership agreement addendum. The court dismissed certain appeals as brought by parties who were not aggrieved and held that the jury's damages verdict was neither a ministerial error nor contrary to the weight of the evidence.

Holdings

  1. The appeal from the order fixing prejudgment interest was dismissed because the plaintiffs were not aggrieved by that order.
  2. IWLA, Inc.'s appeal from the judgment was dismissed because IWLA was not aggrieved by the judgment.
  3. The $36,000 damages verdict could not be corrected because the record did not show a mere ministerial or clerical error.
  4. The contention that the verdict was internally inconsistent was unpreserved because Perchuk did not object before the jury was discharged.
  5. The damages verdict was not contrary to the weight of the evidence because a reasonable jury could have reached the $36,000 award based on a fair interpretation of the conflicting evidence.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the plaintiffs were aggrieved by the order fixing prejudgment interest.
  2. Whether IWLA, Inc. was aggrieved by the judgment.
  3. Whether the jury's $36,000 damages verdict should be corrected as the result of a ministerial or clerical error.
  4. Whether the damages verdict was internally inconsistent and whether that contention was preserved for appellate review.
  5. Whether the damages verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (13)

  • Mixon v. TBV, Inc., 76 AD3d 144(applied)
  • Scaduto v. Suarez, 150 AD2d 545, 547(followed)
  • Gleneida Med. Care, P.C. v. DBG Mgt. Corp., 237 AD3d 1057, 1059(followed)
  • McStocker v. Kolment, 160 AD2d 980, 981(followed)
  • Moisakis v. Allied Bldg. Prods. Corp., 265 AD2d 457, 458(followed)
  • Barry v. Manglass, 55 NY2d 803, 806(followed)
  • Freed v. Best, 203 AD3d 1143, 1145(followed)
  • Rozmarin v. Sookhoo, 172 AD3d 1415, 1417(followed)
  • Guaman v. One Whitehall, L.P., 210 AD3d 1060, 1061-1062(followed)
  • Lapera v. Cee-Jay Real Estate Dev. Corp., 232 AD3d 589, 591, 594(followed)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…