Summary
The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, modified an order denying defendants' motion to compel authorizations for records concerning three prior motor vehicle accidents. The court directed the plaintiff to authorize production of the records to the Supreme Court for in camera inspection to determine whether relevant information should be disclosed, and remitted the matter for that inspection.
Holdings
- A plaintiff who affirmatively places a physical condition in controversy must provide authorizations for pertinent medical records, but the physician-patient privilege is not waived as to unrelated illnesses or injuries.
Questions Presented
- Whether the plaintiff waived the physician-patient privilege as to records from three motor vehicle accidents by placing her right knee injuries in controversy.
- Whether the requested accident records should be produced directly to the defendants or submitted for an in camera inspection to determine their relevance.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (8)
- M.C. v Sylvia Marsh Equities, Inc., 103 AD3d 676, 678(followed)
- Cynthia B. v New Rochelle Hosp. Med. Ctr., 60 NY2d 452, 456-457(followed)
- Froehlich v Kimco Realty Corp., 207 AD3d 448, 449(followed)
- Romance v Zavala, 98 AD3d 726, 728(followed)
- Hamed v Alas Realty Corp., 209 AD3d 628, 629(followed)
- Nesbitt v Advanced Serv. Solutions, 173 AD3d 1056, 1058(followed)
- Bronstein v Omega Constr. Group, Inc., 221 AD3d 577, 578-579(followed)
- Reid v Soults, 114 AD3d 921, 923(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…