Summary
The Appellate Division, Third Department dismissed as moot an appeal concerning a dismissed action for specific performance of a real-property sale contract. The court held that the property had been sold to a nonparty, making specific performance impossible, and declined to sanction the plaintiff for filing a frivolous appeal.
Holdings
- The appeal was moot because defendants no longer had title to convey and specific performance of the real-property sale contract was no longer possible; no exception to the mootness doctrine applied.
- Sanctions were denied because defendants did not meet their burden of showing that plaintiff's appeal was completely without merit in law, undertaken to delay or prolong litigation, or based on false material facts.
Questions Presented
- Whether the appeal from dismissal of an action seeking specific performance became moot after the subject property was sold to a nonparty and no stay preserved plaintiff's claim.
- Whether defendants were entitled to sanctions on the ground that plaintiff's appeal was frivolous.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (12)
- Matter of Sullivan Farms II, Inc. v. Town of Mamakating Planning Bd., 165 AD3d 1447, 1449 [3d Dept 2018](followed)
- Govel v. Trustco Bank, 182 AD3d 838, 839-840 [3d Dept 2020](followed)
- Hulett v. Korb, 243 AD3d 1136, 1138 [3d Dept 2025](followed)
- Chateau Rive Corp. v. Enclave Dev. Assoc., 22 AD3d 445, 447 [2d Dept 2005](followed)
- Chester Green Estates, LLC v. Arlington Chester, LLC, 211 AD3d 801, 804 [2d Dept 2022](followed)
- Drake v. Friedenthal, 108 AD3d 910, 911 [3d Dept 2013](followed)
- Gabriel v. Prime, 30 AD3d 955, 957 [3d Dept 2006](followed)
- Real-X Realty, LLC v. Crest Bellport, LLC, 247 AD3d 944, 946 [2d Dept 2026](compared)
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. LeTennier, ___ AD3d ___, ___, 250 NYS3d 260, 266 [3d Dept 2026](followed)
- LaBoy v. Diven, 244 AD3d 1201, 1204 [2d Dept 2025](followed)
Showing top 10 of 12.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…