Summary
The Supreme Court of Tennessee held that post-conviction review of a death sentence is not mandatory and may be waived by a competent death-sentenced inmate. The court further held that an inmate may revoke an initial waiver within thirty days after the trial court's order dismissing the post-conviction petition. Because Christa Gail Pike moved to revoke her waiver on the twenty-ninth day, the court reversed and remanded for reinstatement of her petition and an evidentiary hearing.
Holdings
- Post-conviction review is not constitutionally or statutorily mandatory in Tennessee and may be waived by a competent death-sentenced inmate.
- A death-sentenced inmate whose initial request to waive post-conviction review has been granted must be allowed one thirty-day period from the trial court's order dismissing the petition to revoke the waiver and reinstate the petition, provided the inmate has not previously waived or attempted to waive post-conviction review.
Questions Presented
- Whether post-conviction review of a death sentence must be mandatory despite a competent death-sentenced inmate's desire to waive it.
- Whether, and under what circumstances, a competent death-sentenced inmate may revoke an initial waiver of post-conviction review.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (33)
- State v. Pike, 978 S.W.2d 904 (Tenn. 1998)(cited)
- Serrano v. State, 133 S.W.3d 599, 604 (Tenn. 2004)(followed)
- Blair v. State, 969 S.W.2d 423, 425 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997)(cited)
- Oliphant v. State, 806 S.W.2d 215, 217 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991)(cited)
- Schick v. United States, 195 U.S. 65, 72 (1904)(cited)
- Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 751 (1983)(cited)
- State v. Smith, 993 S.W.2d 6, 13-16 (Tenn. 1999)(cited)
- Momon v. State, 18 S.W.3d 152, 161 (Tenn. 1999)(cited)
- Zagorski v. State, 983 S.W.2d 654, 658-59 (Tenn. 1998)(cited)
- Collins v. State, 670 S.W.2d 219, 221 (Tenn. 1984)(cited)
Showing top 10 of 33.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…