Earl Douglas Tryon v. Saturn Corporation

254 S.W.3d 321 (Tenn. 2008) · Supreme Court of Tennessee · May 20, 2008 · No. M2006-00940-SC-WCM-CV

Summary

The Tennessee Supreme Court considered whether an employee who returned to work after a workplace injury had a meaningful return to work for purposes of applying the statutory caps on permanent partial disability benefits. The court held that Tryon's retirement was reasonably related to his work-related neck injuries and physician's advice, so the higher statutory multiplier applied. The court reversed the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel and affirmed the trial court's award.

Holdings

  1. An employee who returns to work but later retires or resigns for reasons reasonably related to the workplace injury has not had a meaningful return to work, even if the employee worked for an extended period after returning. Tryon's retirement was reasonably related to his neck injury because of his continuing pain and his company physician's advice to leave industrial work.
  2. The trial court made sufficiently detailed findings under Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-241(c) to support an award of permanent partial disability benefits equal to five and one-half times the medical impairment rating.
  3. The evidence did not preponderate against the trial court's assessment of Tryon's vocational disability at five and one-half times his medical impairment rating.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Tryon had a meaningful return to work when he returned to Saturn for sixteen months after his injury and then retired based on continuing pain and his physician's advice to leave industrial work.
  2. Whether the trial court made sufficiently specific findings under Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-241(c) to support an award of permanent partial disability benefits equal to five and one-half times the medical impairment rating.
  3. Whether the evidence preponderated against the trial court's vocational disability determination.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (24)

  • Wilhelm v. Krogers, 235 S.W.3d 122, 126 (Tenn. 2007)(followed)
  • Whirlpool Corp. v. Nakhoneinh, 69 S.W.3d 164, 167 (Tenn. 2002)(followed)
  • Orrick v. Bestway Trucking, Inc., 184 S.W.3d 211, 216 (Tenn. 2006)(followed)
  • Bohanan v. City of Knoxville, 136 S.W.3d 621, 624 (Tenn. 2004)(followed)
  • Perrin v. Gaylord Entertainment Co., 120 S.W.3d 823, 826 (Tenn. 2003)(followed)
  • Newton v. Scott Health Care Center, 914 S.W.2d 884, 885-86 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. Panel 1995)(followed)
  • Lay v. Scott County Sheriff's Department, 109 S.W.3d 293, 297-99 (Tenn. 2003)(followed)
  • Nelson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 8 S.W.3d 625, 630 (Tenn. 1999)(followed)
  • Hardin v. Royal & Sunalliance Insurance, 104 S.W.3d 501, 504-06 (Tenn. 2003)(followed)
  • Bailey v. Krueger Ringier, Inc., No. 02S01-9409-CH-00061, 1995 WL 572056, at *3-4 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. Panel May 17, 1995)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 24.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…