Reeves v. Aramark Services, Inc.

Reeves, 2025 TN WC App. 53 (Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board 2025) · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · October 7, 2025 · No. 2023-07-5733

Summary

This Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision affirms a trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the respondent employer in a workers' compensation claim. The petitioner, an incarcerated individual alleging an assault while working in a prison kitchen, filed his petition for benefits more than three years after the incident, exceeding the statutory one-year limitation period. The Appeals Board noted the petitioner's failure to file substantive appellate arguments waived further review and affirmed the dismissal based on the expired statute of limitations.

Court
Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
Writing for the Court
Meredith B. Weaver; Timothy W. Conner; Pele I. Godkin
Jurisdiction
Tennessee
Decision date
October 7, 2025
Docket number
2023-07-5733
Procedural posture
Appeal from the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
Standard of review
Factual findings reviewed for preponderance of the evidence; questions of law and summary‑judgment rulings reviewed de novo.
Precedential value
published
Parties
Octaivian D. Reeves v. Aramark Services, Inc.
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

workers compensationsummary judgmentstatutory interpretationappellate procedureemployment law

Practice areas

employment lawworkers compensationappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Reeves was an employee of Aramark Services, Inc. for workers’ compensation purposes
  2. Whether the petition was barred by the one‑year statute of limitations

Holdings

  1. Reeves was not an employee of Aramark Services, Inc. at the time of the alleged injury, so his workers’ compensation claim fails.
  2. The petition was time‑barred because it was filed more than three years after the injury, so summary judgment was proper.

Key quotations

We are also mindful of our obligation to construe the workers’ compensation statutes “fairly, impartially, and in accordance with basic principles of statutory construction” and in a way that does not favor either the employee or the employer. (at 0)
A “genuine issue” exists if “a reasonable [factfinder] could legitimately resolve that fact in favor of one side or the other.” (at 0)

Factual background

Petitioner Octaivian D. Reeves, while incarcerated at Morgan County Correctional Facility, was allegedly assaulted while working in the kitchen. Aramark Services, Inc. provided food services to the facility. Reeves filed a petition for benefit determination on August 18, 2023, more than three years after the September 12, 2019 incident.

Procedural history

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Aramark Services, Inc., finding that the petitioner was not an employee and that the petition was time‑barred. The petitioner appealed to the Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…