Summary
The Fifth District Court of Appeals of Texas denied Christi Stembridge’s petition for writ of mandamus and request for a stay. The court held that her nearly one-year delay in challenging the trial court’s order granting a new trial, without justification, barred mandamus relief.
Holdings
- A relator's unjustified delay in seeking mandamus relief may waive the right to that relief; Stembridge's nearly one-year delay, coupled with her failure to explain the delay and her filing shortly before the scheduled new trial, barred mandamus relief.
- A writ of mandamus issues only to correct a clear abuse of discretion when no adequate remedy by appeal exists, and issuance is discretionary rather than a matter of right.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court of appeals should issue a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to explain with reasonable specificity why it set aside the jury verdict and granted a new trial.
- Whether Stembridge's nearly one-year delay in seeking mandamus relief barred that extraordinary remedy.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (6)
- Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
- In re Pendragon Transp., LLC, 423 S.W.3d 537, 540 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2014, orig. proceeding)(followed)
- Rivercenter Assocs. v. Rivera, 858 S.W.2d 366, 367 (Tex. 1993) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
- In re Int'l Profit Assocs., Inc., 274 S.W.3d 672, 676 (Tex. 2009) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
- Int'l Awards, Inc. v. Medina, 900 S.W.2d 934, 936 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1995, orig. proceeding)(followed)
- Bailey v. Baker, 696 S.W.2d 255, 256 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1985, orig. proceeding)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…