Summary
The Texas Fifth Court of Appeals denied a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s denial of a plea to the jurisdiction. The court held that the relators failed to demonstrate a clear abuse of discretion concerning standing and the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine.
Holdings
- A relator ordinarily must demonstrate that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that the relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy; however, when the mandamus petition challenges the trial court's subject-matter jurisdiction, the relator need not establish the lack of an adequate appellate remedy.
- Relators failed to demonstrate that the trial court clearly abused its discretion in denying their plea to the jurisdiction, so mandamus relief was not warranted.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court clearly abused its discretion by denying relators' plea to the jurisdiction.
- Whether relators demonstrated that the real party in interest lacked standing to bring the underlying claims.
- Whether the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine deprived the trial court of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (2)
- In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
- In re Episcopal School of Dallas, Inc., 556 S.W.3d 347, 360 (Tex. App.—Dallas, 2017 orig. proceeding)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…