Gary Derouin v. Dodeka LLC

No. 04-11-00085-CV · Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District · July 13, 2011 · No. No. 04-11-00085-CV

Summary

The Texas Court of Appeals dismissed Gary Derouin’s appeal from a justice court judgment affirmed in a trial de novo proceeding. The court held that it lacked jurisdiction because no written final judgment had been signed by the County Court at Law. The court explained that a new trial de novo and written final judgment were required before an appeal could be taken.

Court
Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District
Writing for the Court
Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice; Rebecca Simmons, Justice; Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
Jurisdiction
Texas
Decision date
July 13, 2011
Docket number
No. 04-11-00085-CV
Procedural posture
Appellant sought review of proceedings in the County Court at Law affirming a justice court judgment. The court of appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the record contained no written final judgment signed by the county court judge.
Standard of review
The court reviewed its appellate jurisdiction de novo based on the existence of an appealable final written judgment.
Precedential value
Published memorandum opinion; precedential status is not otherwise specified in the opinion text.
Parties
Gary Derouin v. Dodeka LLC
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

appellate jurisdictionfinal judgment ruleappellate procedurecivil procedure

Practice areas

Civil procedureAppellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court of appeals had jurisdiction over an appeal when the county court had not signed or entered a written final judgment.
  2. Whether the appeal should be dismissed for lack of an appealable final judgment.

Holdings

  1. The court of appeals lacks jurisdiction over an appeal when the trial court has not rendered an appealable final judgment in writing.
  2. The appeal cannot proceed until the county court conducts a new trial de novo, renders a written final judgment, and thereby creates an appealable judgment for review.

Key quotations

In the absence of an appealable final judgment in writing, this court has no jurisdiction over this appeal. (-2-)
This Court will not have jurisdiction over this matter until the County Court at Law conducts a new trial de novo to provide Derouin with his appeal from the justice court’s judgment, and renders a written final judgment, which may then be appealed to this Court. (-2-)

Factual background

The justice court awarded Dodeka LLC $6,022.04 and $400 in attorney's fees. A trial de novo was conducted in the county court, but the record contained no written judgment signed by the judge who presided over that proceeding, and the court was informed that no written judgment existed. Derouin conceded that the county court had not rendered a written judgment.

Procedural history

The Bexar County Justice Court rendered judgment for Dodeka LLC for $6,022.04 plus $400 in attorney's fees. A trial de novo occurred in County Court at Law No. 2, but no written judgment was signed or entered. After construing part of Derouin's mandamus petition as a notice of appeal, the court ordered him to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed. Derouin conceded that no written county court judgment existed, and the court dismissed the appeal.

Remand instructions

The court stated that it would not have jurisdiction until the County Court at Law conducts a new trial de novo and renders a written final judgment, which may then be appealed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Texas Court Of Appeals Of Texas Fourth District