In re AYS Engineering, LLC

No. 03-26-00366-CV · Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, at Austin · May 7, 2026 · No. 03-26-00366-CV

Summary

The Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, denied AYS Engineering, LLC’s petition for writ of mandamus challenging the denial of its motion to dismiss under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 150.002. The court held that an interlocutory appeal provided an adequate remedy and dismissed AYS Engineering’s motion for temporary relief as moot.

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, at Austin
Writing for the Court
Karin Crump; Theofanis; Ellis
Jurisdiction
Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, Austin
Decision date
May 7, 2026
Docket number
03-26-00366-CV
Procedural posture
Original mandamus proceeding by AYS Engineering, LLC challenging the trial court's denial of its motion to dismiss under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 150.002.
Standard of review
Mandamus relief requires the relator to lack an adequate remedy by appeal; because the challenged order was immediately appealable, the court concluded that an adequate remedy existed.
Precedential value
Published memorandum opinion
Disposition
writ_denied

Topics

interlocutory appealwrit of certiorarimotions to dismissappellate procedurecivil procedure

Practice areas

civil procedureappellate procedureremedies

Questions Presented

  1. Whether mandamus relief was available to challenge the trial court's denial of a motion to dismiss under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 150.002 when the order was immediately appealable.
  2. Whether AYS Engineering's motion for temporary relief and stay should remain pending after the mandamus petition was denied.

Holdings

  1. Mandamus relief was unavailable because an order granting or denying a motion to dismiss under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 150.002 is immediately appealable, providing AYS Engineering with an adequate remedy by interlocutory appeal.
  2. The motion for temporary relief and stay was dismissed as moot after the petition for writ of mandamus was denied.

Key quotations

Thus, AYS Engineering, LLC has an adequate remedy by interlocutory appeal.
On this basis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and dismiss the motion for temporary relief as moot.

Factual background

AYS Engineering, LLC was sued for damages allegedly arising from the provision of professional services by a licensed or registered professional. It moved to dismiss under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 150.002, which concerns the required certificate of merit in such actions. The trial court denied the motion to dismiss.

Procedural history

AYS Engineering, LLC filed a motion to dismiss based on the certificate-of-merit requirement in section 150.002 and sought mandamus relief after the trial court denied the motion. AYS also filed a notice of interlocutory appeal from the same order. The court of appeals denied the mandamus petition because interlocutory appeal provided an adequate remedy and dismissed the motion for temporary relief as moot.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…