Summary
The Supreme Court of Texas held that a term life insurance policy issued during marriage through an ERISA employee benefit plan was community property under Texas law. However, it held that the surviving wife's claims for constructive fraud on the community and imposition of a constructive trust on the policy proceeds were preempted by ERISA. The court reversed the judgment in part and otherwise affirmed and remanded for further proceedings.
Holdings
- A term life insurance policy issued during the marriage is presumed to be community property under Texas law when it was not a renewal or mutation of an earlier policy that existed before marriage.
- ERISA preempts a Texas community-property claim for constructive fraud when the claim would give the surviving spouse an interest in proceeds of an ERISA-governed life insurance plan contrary to the beneficiary designation and plan documents.
- The constructive-trust remedy is likewise preempted because it rests on the underlying community-property right and would require recovery of proceeds in a manner inconsistent with the ERISA plan's beneficiary designation.
- The challenges to the court of appeals' disposition of the surviving-spouse allowance and attorney's-fee issues lack merit.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Prudential term life insurance policy issued during the marriage was community property or Christopher's separate property.
- Whether ERISA preempted Marleen Barnett's Texas-law claim for constructive fraud on the community based on the disposition of the Prudential policy proceeds.
- Whether ERISA preempted the corresponding constructive-trust remedy.
- Whether the challenges to the surviving-spouse allowance and attorney's-fee award had merit.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (15)
- McCurdy v. McCurdy, 372 S.W.2d 381 (Tex. Civ. App.—Waco 1963, writ ref'd)(followed)
- Boggs v. Boggs, 520 U.S. 833 (1997)(followed)
- Egelhoff v. Egelhoff, a minor, by and through her natural parent, Breiner, et al., Egelhoff v. Egelhoff, 532 U.S. 141 (2001)(followed)
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N.A., Inc., 519 U.S. 316 (1997)(followed)
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Insurance Co., 514 U.S. 645 (1995)(considered)
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983)(followed)
- Mackey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc., 486 U.S. 825 (1988)(distinguished)
- Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund, Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund, 493 U.S. 365 (1990)(distinguished)
- Emard v. Hughes Aircraft Co., 153 F.3d 949 (9th Cir. 1998)(implicitly rejected)
- Manning v. Hayes, 212 F.3d 866 (5th Cir. 2000)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…