Summary
The Supreme Court of Texas held that Wallace Maury Poole's allegations concerning costs incurred after a school district foreclosed on an oil and gas lease did not constitute a takings claim for which governmental immunity was waived under the Texas Constitution. The Court also rejected the characterization of the action as a collateral attack on the prior tax judgment. It reversed the court of appeals and rendered judgment dismissing the case.
Holdings
- Poole's allegations asserted that the District injured him through its conduct, not that the District took his property without compensation; therefore, the allegations did not state a takings claim for which governmental immunity from suit was waived.
- The trial court correctly dismissed Poole's case for want of jurisdiction.
Questions Presented
- Whether Poole's claim for damages allegedly caused by the District's post-foreclosure conduct constituted a takings claim for which governmental immunity from suit was waived under article I, section 17 of the Texas Constitution.
- Whether the trial court correctly dismissed Poole's action for want of jurisdiction.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (1)
- City of Beaumont v. Bouillion, 896 S.W.2d 143, 149 (Tex. 1995)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…