Summary
This partial dissent addresses whether a contractual provision waiving consequential damages and stating that no claim shall be made for such damages constitutes both a damages waiver and a covenant not to sue. Justice Boyd concludes that Westlake breached the covenant by asserting consequential-damages claims and that James should recover the attorney’s fees incurred in defending those claims. The dissent agrees that Westlake’s oral notice did not substantially comply with the contract’s written-notice requirement and that Westlake could not recover replacement costs.
Holdings
- Oral notice cannot constitute substantial compliance with a contractual written-notice requirement.
- Westlake could not recover the costs it incurred when it replaced James because its oral notice failed to substantially comply with the contract's written-notice requirement and the contract did not otherwise authorize recovery of those costs.
- The contract's statement that "no claim shall be made" for consequential damages constituted a covenant not to sue for such damages, separate from the mutual waiver of consequential damages.
- Because Westlake breached the covenant not to sue for consequential damages, James was entitled to the jury's award of attorney's fees incurred in defending against Westlake's consequential-damages claims.
Questions Presented
- Whether the contractual language providing that no claim shall be made for consequential damages constitutes a covenant not to sue, in addition to a waiver of consequential damages.
- Whether breach of that covenant would permit James to recover attorney's fees incurred in defending Westlake's consequential-damages claims.
- Whether oral notice could constitute substantial compliance with the contract's written-notice requirement.
- Whether Westlake could recover the costs incurred when it replaced James after providing oral rather than written notice.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Enter. Leasing Co. of Hous. v. Barrios, 156 S.W.3d 547, 549 (Tex. 2004)(followed)
- Neece v. A.A.A. Realty Co., 322 S.W.2d 597, 600 (Tex. 1959)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…