Summary
This document is a petition for discretionary review filed in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on behalf of James Agbeze. It challenges the denial of Article 11.072 habeas corpus relief concerning an alleged Brady violation, actual innocence, and the sufficiency of the evidence underlying a theft conviction. The petition argues that the habeas court abused its discretion in denying relief.
Questions Presented
- Whether the habeas court abused its discretion by denying Article 11.072 relief based on Agbeze's actual-innocence and Brady claims.
- Whether the evidence was legally sufficient to support Agbeze's conviction.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- Ex parte Cruzata, 220 S.W.3d 518, 520 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007)(followed)
- Ex parte Lewis, 219 S.W.3d 335 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007)(cited)
- Ex parte Peterson, 117 S.W.3d 804, 819 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003)(limited)
- Ex parte Scott, 190 S.W.3d 672, 673 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (per curiam)(followed)
- Kniatt v. State, 206 S.W.3d 657, 664 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…