In re Continental Airlines Flight 1404 Litigation

In re Continental Airlines Flight 1404 Litigation · Texas Multidistrict Litigation Panel · May 7, 2009

Summary

The Texas Multidistrict Litigation Panel grants a motion to transfer and stay lawsuits arising from Continental Airlines Flight 1404’s runway excursion and fire. The panel holds that the cases are related because they share common factual and liability issues, and that coordinated pretrial proceedings in a Harris County court will promote efficiency, consistency, and convenience.

Court
Texas Multidistrict Litigation Panel
Writing for the Court
Ann Crawford McClure; Presiding Judge Peeples; Justice Lang; Justice Stone
Jurisdiction
Texas
Decision date
May 7, 2009
Procedural posture
The movants sought transfer and consolidation of six related negligence actions pending in multiple Harris County district courts for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings under the Texas multidistrict litigation rules.
Standard of review
The panel exercised its discretion under Texas Government Code section 74.162 and Texas Rule of Judicial Administration 13 to determine whether the cases were related and whether transfer would promote convenience and the just and efficient conduct of the litigation.
Precedential value
Published Texas Multidistrict Litigation Panel opinion
Parties
Continental Airlines, Inc., Captain David Butler, First Officer Chad Levang v. Plaintiffs in the Flight 1404 litigation
Disposition
other

Topics

civil procedurediscovery disputenegligenceevidence

Practice areas

civil proceduremultidistrict litigationaviation negligenceevidence

Questions Presented

  1. Whether civil actions arising from the Flight 1404 accident were related because they involved one or more common questions of fact.
  2. Whether transfer to a single pretrial court would serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation.
  3. Whether the Texas multidistrict litigation statute and rules authorize transfer when the related actions are pending in multiple district courts within the same county.
  4. Whether the cases were insufficiently numerous or complex to warrant multidistrict treatment.

Holdings

  1. The Texas Multidistrict Litigation Panel may transfer civil actions to a single district court for consolidated or coordinated pretrial proceedings even when the actions are pending in different district courts within the same county.
  2. The Flight 1404 cases were related because they involved common questions of fact arising from one accident and overlapping negligence allegations.
  3. Numerosity and complexity are not prerequisites to transfer under the Texas multidistrict litigation procedure, although they may be relevant considerations.
  4. Transfer of the related cases to one pretrial court would promote the just and efficient handling of the litigation and serve the convenience of witnesses and experts.

Key quotations

These cases arise from one common event, and no one has seriously denied that the liability issues in each of them will be substantially the same.
One virtue of transferring related cases to a single pretrial judge is that issues, once raised, will be decided the same way in the future.

Factual background

Continental Flight 1404 departed the runway at Denver International Airport on December 20, 2008, caught fire, and resulted in injuries to 37 passengers and crew members. Thirteen plaintiffs filed suits against Continental in six Harris County district courts, and nine also sued the pilots. The suits raised overlapping allegations concerning aircraft operation, maintenance, passenger handling, safety inspections, hiring, training, and supervision, and involved many of the same fact and expert witnesses.

Procedural history

Following the December 20, 2008 runway departure and fire involving Continental Flight 1404, multiple passengers filed separate suits against Continental and, in some cases, the pilots. Continental and the pilots moved to transfer and consolidate the cases. The plaintiffs opposed transfer, arguing that the cases were not multidistrict litigation, were not sufficiently numerous or complex, or could be coordinated under Harris County Local Rule 3.2. The Texas Multidistrict Litigation Panel granted the motions to transfer and stay and stated that the pretrial judge would be appointed by separate order.

Remand instructions

The motions to transfer and stay were granted. The pretrial judge was to be appointed by separate order, and the cases were designated for a Harris County pretrial court.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…