Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an order to show cause regarding dismissal for lack of prosecution. The court ordered the plaintiff to explain by March 10, 2023, why the action should not be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), and stated that failure to respond would result in dismissal.
Holdings
- Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), a district court may dismiss an action sua sponte for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or failure to comply with the court's orders; the court therefore could order plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court could sua sponte require the plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 44 (1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…