Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed Gilmer Alberto Cabrera Armas’s motion for a stay of removal without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court held that the REAL ID Act precluded district-court consideration of the motion and instructed Cabrera Armas to file the petition in the Ninth Circuit.
Holdings
- The district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider Plaintiff's motion for a stay of removal because the REAL ID Act of 2005 precludes district courts from reviewing challenges to removal.
- The district court had an independent duty to determine whether subject matter jurisdiction existed and could dismiss the case when jurisdiction was absent.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court had subject matter jurisdiction to consider a motion for a stay of removal pending ICE's decision on a Form I-246 application.
- Whether the case should be dismissed and the requested stay denied when jurisdiction was lacking.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006)(followed)
- Gomez v. Holder, No. SACV 13-718 PA (MAN), 2013 WL 12144082, at *1 (C.D. Cal. May 6, 2013)(followed)
- Momeni v. Chertoff, 521 F.3d 1094, 1095 (9th Cir. 2008)(followed)
- Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co., 526 U.S. 574, 577, 583 (1999)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…