In re Maria Elizabeth Montero Leon

In re Montero Leon · United States District Court for the Central District of California · June 4, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-04078-MCS

Summary

The United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed Guillermo Montero’s appeal from a bankruptcy court order approving an interim distribution of funds held in trust. The court concluded that it lacked jurisdiction because the order was not appealable as of right, and Appellant had not obtained leave to appeal or responded to the order to show cause.

Court
United States District Court for the Central District of California
Writing for the Court
Mark C. Scarsi
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the Central District of California
Decision date
June 4, 2025
Docket number
2:25-cv-04078-MCS
Procedural posture
Appellant appealed a bankruptcy court order granting the debtor's motion for an interim distribution of funds held in trust. The district court ordered appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. After appellant filed a statement of issues but failed to timely respond to the order to show cause, the district court dismissed the appeal and remanded the action to the bankruptcy court.
Standard of review
The district court reviewed its jurisdiction over the bankruptcy appeal, including whether the challenged bankruptcy court order was final or otherwise appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a).
Precedential value
Unknown; no precedential designation appears in the opinion.
Parties
Guillermo Montero
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

appellate jurisdictionfinal judgment ruleinterlocutory appealbankruptcyappellate procedure

Practice areas

bankruptcyappellate procedurecivil procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a) over an appeal from a bankruptcy court order granting an interim distribution of trust funds.
  2. Whether appellant's failure to respond to the order to show cause warranted dismissal of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Holdings

  1. The district court lacked jurisdiction over the appeal because the challenged order was not an order appealable as of right under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a), was not issued under 11 U.S.C. § 1121(d), and appellant had not obtained leave to appeal.
  2. Appellant's failure to timely respond to the order to show cause, including his refusal to brief the finality of the challenged order, supported dismissal of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Key quotations

District courts have jurisdiction over bankruptcy appeals from final judgments, orders, and decrees; from interlocutory orders issued under 11 U.S.C. § 1121(d); and from other interlocutory orders and decrees if given leave of court. (at 2)
The Court dismisses the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remands the action for further proceedings in the bankruptcy court. (at 2)

Factual background

The bankruptcy court held funds in trust and granted debtor Maria Elizabeth Montero Leon's motion for an interim distribution of those funds. Her spouse, Guillermo Montero, appealed that order. The district court noted the interim nature of the distribution order and reviewed the bankruptcy court's docket, taking judicial notice of it.

Procedural history

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California granted debtor Maria Elizabeth Montero Leon's motion for an interim distribution of funds held in trust. Her spouse, Guillermo Montero, appealed to the district court. The district court concluded that the challenged order was not appealable as of right under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a), that appellant had not obtained leave to appeal, and that appellant failed to address whether the interim order was final.

Remand instructions

The action is remanded for further proceedings in the bankruptcy court.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…