Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of California denies as moot Yoshiharu Nomura’s motion to dismiss because he died before the action was filed. The court grants SBD Real Estate Four, LLC leave to amend its complaint to name Nomura’s estate under California Probate Code section 550 and seek recovery limited to applicable insurance coverage. The court concludes that the amendment is not futile and would not unduly prejudice the opposing parties.
Holdings
- Leave to amend was appropriate because all five Rule 15(a) factors favored amendment: there was no undue delay or bad faith, amendment would not meaningfully prejudice the opposing parties, amendment was not futile, and plaintiff had not previously amended its complaint.
- Rule 25 does not, by its text, preclude plaintiff from amending the complaint to name the Estate of Nomura under California Probate Code section 550, even though Nomura died before the action commenced.
- Nomura's motion to dismiss was denied as moot.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff should be granted leave under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) to amend the complaint to name the Estate of Yoshiharu Nomura as a defendant under California Probate Code section 550.
- Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25 precludes amendment or substitution where the deceased individual died before commencement of the action.
- Whether Nomura's motion to dismiss should be decided after plaintiff sought leave to amend.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (24)
- Conservation Force v. Salazar, 646 F.3d 1240, 1242 (9th Cir. 2011)(applied)
- Balisteri v. Pacifica Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990)(quoted)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)(applied)
- Pareto v. FDIC, 139 F.3d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1998)(applied)
- Sprewell v. Golden State Warriors, 266 F.3d 979, 988 (9th Cir. 2001)(applied)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009)(applied)
- Moss v. United States Secret Service, 572 F.3d 962, 969 (9th Cir. 2009)(applied)
- In re American Continental Corp./Lincoln Savings & Loan Securities Litigation, 102 F.3d 1524, 1537 (9th Cir. 1996), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Lexecon, Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, 523 U.S. 26 (1998)(applied)
- In re Silicon Graphics Inc. Securities Litigation, 183 F.3d 970, 986 (9th Cir. 1999)(applied)
- Lee v. City of Los Angeles, 250 F.3d 668, 689 (9th Cir. 2001)(applied)
Showing top 10 of 24.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…