Summary
This document is an order to show cause issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California regarding possible dismissal for lack of prosecution. The court directs the plaintiff to file proof of service, an answer, or an application for entry of default concerning Sabrina D. Peterson by March 13, 2025, and warns that failure to respond may result in dismissal.
Holdings
- Absent good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice when the summons and complaint are not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, and the court may dismiss earlier when the plaintiff has not diligently prosecuted the action.
- A defendant generally must answer within 21 days after service, or within 60 days when the defendant is the United States.
- When service is directed to individuals or business entities in a foreign country, the plaintiff must exercise all reasonable diligence and attempt service within the 90-day period.
Questions Presented
- Whether the plaintiff should be required to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution based on the apparent failure to timely serve the defendant, obtain an answer, or seek entry of default.
- What deadlines and procedural requirements govern service, responsive pleadings, and dismissal for failure to prosecute.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30 (1962)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…