Jennifer L. R. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

Jennifer L. R. · United States District Court for the District of Connecticut · February 4, 2026 · No. 3:24-CV-01382 (MEG)

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut grants Plaintiff’s motion for approval of attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The court approves $25,449.00 in fees from withheld past-due benefits, finding the amount reasonable and not a windfall, and directs counsel to refund previously awarded EAJA fees and $9,200 in benefits received directly from the Social Security Administration.

Holdings

  1. The fee motion was timely because it was filed within 14 days after the Administration's notice of award, calculated with the applicable presumption that notice is received three days after mailing.
  2. A contingent fee equal to 25 percent of past-due benefits may be approved when the attorney demonstrates that it is reasonable for the services rendered and does not constitute a windfall.
  3. Counsel must refund to plaintiff the previously awarded EAJA fee of $4,553.96 and the $9,200.00 payment received directly from withheld past-due benefits.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the motion for approval of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) was timely.
  2. Whether the contingent fee agreement and requested fee of $25,449.00 were reasonable under § 406(b), rather than excessive, the product of fraud or overreaching, or a windfall.
  3. Whether counsel was required to refund the previously awarded EAJA fee and the $9,200.00 payment received from withheld past-due benefits to plaintiff.

Disposition

approved

Cases Cited (10)

  • Sinkler v. Berryhill, 932 F.3d 83, 85, 89 n.5 (2d Cir. 2019)(followed)
  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796, 807-08 (2002)(followed)
  • Mix v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 6:14-CV-06219 (MAT), 2017 WL 2222247, at *2 (W.D.N.Y. May 22, 2017)(followed)
  • Wells v. Sullivan, 907 F.2d 367, 371-72 (2d Cir. 1990)(followed)
  • Fields v. Kijakazi, 24 F.4th 845, 854-56 (2d Cir. 2022)(followed)
  • Sue-Anne O. M. v. Kijakazi, No. 3:20-CV-00301 (MEG), 2023 WL 3737712, at *3 (D. Conn. May 31, 2023)(followed)
  • Bate v. Berryhill, No. 18-CV-1229 (ER), 2020 WL 728784, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 13, 2020)(followed)
  • Valle v. Colvin, No. 13-CV-2876 (JPO), 2019 WL 2118841, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. May 15, 2019)(followed)
  • Buckley v. Berryhill, 15-CV-0341-A, 2018 WL 3368434, at *2 (W.D.N.Y. July 10, 2018)(followed)
  • Vainwright v. Berryhill, No. 3:15CV01025 (JCH)(SALM), 2017 WL 3493608, at *3 (D. Conn. Aug. 15, 2017)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…