Summary
The court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiffs’ third motion to compel discovery in a civil rights action arising from alleged mistreatment of inmates following a 2017 prison uprising. Defendants were ordered to submit an affidavit confirming the nonexistence of additional CERT or QRT rosters for specified dates, while requests concerning use-of-force reports and attorneys’ fees were denied. The court also cautioned that future nondispositive motions may be dismissed for failure to comply with the District of Delaware’s oral meet-and-confer requirement.
Holdings
- The court granted the motion to compel in part by requiring Defendants to serve and file an affidavit from a knowledgeable Delaware Department of Correction employee confirming the representation that no additional CERT or QRT rosters exist for the specified Critical Dates, accompanied by counsel's signed certification that counsel made a reasonable inquiry into the accuracy of the sworn statements. The request for production of additional rosters was denied in all other respects.
- The court denied without prejudice Plaintiffs' request to compel production of use-of-force reports and associated administrative or investigative documents.
- Plaintiffs were not entitled to attorneys' fees and costs under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(g)(3) and 37(a)(5)(A)(ii).
- Plaintiffs did not satisfy District of Delaware Local Rule 7.1.1 because they did not engage in the required oral communication before filing the motion to compel. A teleconference held after filing did not cure the deficiency.
Questions Presented
- Whether Defendants should be compelled to produce additional CERT or QRT rosters or provide an affidavit confirming that no additional rosters exist.
- Whether Defendants should be compelled to produce use-of-force reports and related administrative or investigative documents.
- Whether Plaintiffs were entitled to attorneys' fees and costs under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(g)(3) and 37(a)(5)(A)(ii).
- Whether Plaintiffs satisfied District of Delaware Local Rule 7.1.1's oral meet-and-confer requirement before filing the motion to compel.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Adger v. Coupe, 2022 WL 777196, at *4 (3d Cir. Mar. 14, 2022)(followed)
- Roe v. Wyndham Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 18-1525-RGA-SRF, 2023 WL 5348862, at *10 (D. Del. Aug. 21, 2023)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.