Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Axion Biosystems, Inc.

Agilent v. Axion · United States District Court for the District of Delaware · January 6, 2026 · No. Civil Action No. 23-198-CJB

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Delaware addresses cross-motions for summary judgment concerning whether patent claims reciting “cell index” terms are indefinite. The court grants Agilent Technologies’ motion, adopts its proposed constructions, and denies Axion Biosystems’ indefiniteness motion. The opinion concludes that the intrinsic evidence provides reasonable certainty regarding the meaning and scope of the coined claim terms.

Holdings

  1. The terms "calculating cell index values," "calculating a cell index," and "cell index" are not indefinite because the intrinsic record informs a person of ordinary skill in the art, with reasonable certainty, that the terms concern parameters derived from measured impedance values and reflecting a change in impedance values.
  2. "Calculating cell index values" means "calculating parameters derived from measured impedance values that reflect a change in impedance values."
  3. "Calculating a cell index" means "calculating a parameter derived from measured impedance values that reflects a change in impedance values," and "cell index" means "a parameter derived from measured impedance values that reflects a change in impedance values."

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the asserted patent claims reciting "calculating cell index values," "calculating a cell index," and "cell index" are indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b).
  2. How the disputed cell-index terms should be construed.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (26)

  • Glaxo SmithKline LLC v. Glenmark Pharms. Inc., USA, Civil Action Nos. 14-877-LPS-CJB, 14-878-LPS-CJB, 2017 WL 8948972, at *3-4 (D. Del. May 24, 2017), report and recommendation adopted, 2017 WL 2493786 (D. Del. June 9, 2017)(followed)
  • Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc., 572 U.S. 898 (2014)(followed)
  • All Dental Prodx, LLC v. Advantage Dental Prods., Inc., 309 F.3d 774, 779-80 (Fed. Cir. 2002)(followed)
  • H-W Tech., L.C. v. Overstock.com, Inc., 758 F.3d 1329, 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2014)(followed)
  • Intel Corp. v. VIA Techs., Inc., 319 F.3d 1357, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • Tech. Licensing Corp. v. Videotek, Inc., 545 F.3d 1316, 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2008)(followed)
  • Iridescent Networks, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility, LLC, 933 F.3d 1345, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2019)(followed)
  • IQASR LLC v. Wendt Corp., 825 F. App’x 900, 904 (Fed. Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Indacon, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., 824 F.3d 1352, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2016)(followed)
  • Irdeto Access, Inc. v. Echostar Satellite Corp., 383 F.3d 1295, 1300 (Fed. Cir. 2004)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 26.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…