Michael Caine Redifer, Sr. v. T. Vaught, Warden, and FCI Sandstone

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota adopted a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation after finding no clear error and noting that no objections were filed. The court denied Michael Caine Redifer, Sr.'s petition for a writ of habeas corpus and dismissed the matter without prejudice.

Holdings

1. When no party objects to a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court reviews it for clear error under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
2. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation was accepted in full, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus was denied, and the matter was dismissed without prejudice.

Questions Presented

1. Whether the magistrate judge's Order and Report and Recommendation contained clear error when no party filed timely objections.
2. Whether the petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be denied and the matter dismissed without prejudice.

Disposition

dismissed