Summary
The United States District Court for the District of Nevada addresses Plaintiff Barry James Christensen, II’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint and Defendants’ motion to strike that motion and the proposed amended complaint. The court grants the motion to amend in part and denies it in part, rejecting proposed new defendants and claims including constructive fraud and constructive discharge as unduly delayed, prejudicial, or futile. The court denies Defendants’ motion to strike.
Holdings
- Leave to amend was denied because the proposed amendment was unduly delayed and futile. Alleged ownership or financial benefit, without allegations of operational or economic control over the employment relationship, was insufficient to plead that these parties were employers under the FLSA.
- Leave to add Findlay Management Group was denied because the motion was unduly delayed and adding the entity would cause substantial prejudice by requiring additional discovery and expanding the litigation.
- Leave to add all four proposed claims was denied because each amendment was futile and independently was affected by undue delay and prejudice.
- Leave to amend was granted to remove Findlay Automotive and withdraw the claims under NRS 613.120, NRS 598.0915(15), NRS 598.0923(1)(d), NRS 598.0923(1)(e), and NRS 41.130.
- The motion to strike Christensen's motion to amend and proposed amended complaint was denied.
Questions Presented
- Whether leave should be granted to add Clifford J. Findlay, Donna Sue Findlay, the Findlay Trust, and Findlay Management Group as defendants.
- Whether leave should be granted to add claims for constructive fraud, constructive discharge, unjust enrichment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
- Whether leave should be granted to withdraw three existing claims and remove Findlay Automotive as a defendant.
- Whether defendants' Rule 12(f) motion to strike the motion to amend and proposed amended complaint should be granted.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (55)
- Sonoma County Ass'n of Retired Employees v. Sonoma County, 708 F.3d 1109, 1117 (9th Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Nevada Power Co., 950 F.2d 1429, 1432 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- Desertrain v. City of Los Angeles, 754 F.3d 1147, 1154 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)
- Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc., 953 F.3d 567, 574 (9th Cir. 2020)(followed)
- Eminence Capital, LLC v. Aspeon, Inc., 316 F.3d 1048, 1052 (9th Cir. 2003)(followed)
- DCD Programs, Ltd. v. Leighton, 833 F.2d 183, 186-87 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
- Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. Rose, 893 F.2d 1074, 1079 (9th Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Nunes v. Ashcroft, 375 F.3d 805, 808 (9th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- Bonin v. Calderon, 59 F.3d 815, 845 (9th Cir. 1995)(followed)
- Missouri ex rel. Koster v. Harris, 847 F.3d 646, 656 (9th Cir. 2017)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 55.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…