Kristopher David Hunt v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Hunt · United States District Court for the District of Nevada · January 13, 2026 · No. 3:25-cv-00689-CSD

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Nevada grants Kristopher David Hunt’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. The court allows his complaint seeking judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision to proceed and directs service under the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff qualified to proceed in forma pauperis because the application showed that he could not pay the filing fee.
  2. The complaint should not be dismissed at the screening stage because it sought review of a final Social Security Administration decision and appeared to satisfy administrative-exhaustion requirements.
  3. The complaint could proceed, and the Clerk was directed to file it and initiate service on the Commissioner.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff qualified to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).
  2. Whether the complaint should be dismissed during screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
  3. Whether the complaint adequately invoked federal judicial review of a final Social Security Administration decision and appeared to satisfy administrative-exhaustion requirements.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (12)

  • Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc)(followed)
  • United States v. McQuade, 647 F.2d 938, 940 (9th Cir. 1981)(followed)
  • Jefferson v. United States, 277 F.2d 723, 725 (9th Cir. 1960)(followed)
  • Adkins v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948)(followed)
  • Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Chappel v. Laboratory Corp. of America, 232 F.3d 719, 723 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
  • Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1969)(followed)
  • Hughes v. Rowe, 449 U.S. 5, 9 (1980)(followed)
  • Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 570 (2007)(followed)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 12.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…