Summary
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denied Aetna’s motion to dismiss an amended putative class action complaint involving reimbursement for out-of-network breast reconstruction services under Aetna’s National Advantage Program. The court held that the plaintiffs adequately alleged an entitlement to benefits under ERISA § 502(a)(1)(B) based on mandatory plan-summary language concerning payment of a pre-negotiated rate. The court also allowed the plaintiffs’ claims for injunctive and other equitable relief under ERISA § 502(a)(3) to proceed.
Holdings
- The amended complaint plausibly stated a claim under ERISA § 502(a)(1)(B) because the mandatory NAP language in the plan summaries permitted an inference that plaintiffs had a legally enforceable right to payment at the applicable pre-negotiated rates and that Aetna improperly failed to pay those rates.
- The § 502(a)(3)(A) claim for injunctive relief and the § 502(a)(3)(B) claim for appropriate equitable relief survived the motion to dismiss.
- The court could not consider Aetna's declaration because it was extraneous to and not relied on in the amended complaint; the Multiplan Agreement did not warrant dismissal even assuming it could be considered.
Questions Presented
- Whether the amended complaint plausibly alleged an enforceable entitlement to benefits under ERISA § 502(a)(1)(B) based on the plan summaries' NAP provisions.
- Whether the claims for injunctive and other equitable relief under ERISA § 502(a)(3) should be dismissed as duplicative or because the § 502(a)(1)(B) claim failed.
- Whether the court could consider the Multiplan Agreement and a declaration submitted by Aetna in connection with the motion to dismiss.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (15)
- Redstone v. Aetna, Inc., No. 21-19434, 2025 WL 842514 (D.N.J. Mar. 18, 2025)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 675, 678–79 (2009)(followed)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)(followed)
- Malleus v. George, 641 F.3d 560, 563 (3d Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside, 578 F.3d 203, 210–11 (3d Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Phillips v. County of Allegheny, 515 F.3d 224, 233 (3d Cir. 2008)(followed)
- Davis v. Wells Fargo, 824 F.3d 333, 341 (3d Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Fleisher v. Standard Insurance Co., 679 F.3d 116, 120 (3d Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Hooven v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 465 F.3d 566, 574 (3d Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Hein v. F.D.I.C., 88 F.3d 210, 215 (3d Cir. 1996)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.