Ashley Imming v. Osvaldo De La Vega, Mesilla Capital Investments, LLC, Southwest Health Services, P.A., and Mesilla Capital Investments de Mexico, S. DE. R.I.

Imming · United States District Court for the District of New Mexico · December 19, 2025 · No. Civ. No. 23-378 GJF/DLM; 2:23-cv-00378

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico partially grants Plaintiff Ashley Imming’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs following a bench trial. Applying New Mexico law and the lodestar method, the Court awards $312,392.20 and reduces the requested hours and rates for redundant, excessive, or otherwise unreasonable work, while rejecting a requested fee multiplier.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff was a prevailing party in a proceeding under the New Mexico Human Rights Act and was entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys' fees under N.M.S.A. § 28-1-13(D), including fees incurred in this federal collection action.
  2. Reasonable statutory attorneys' fees are calculated using the lodestar method, multiplying reasonably expended hours by reasonable hourly rates, with adjustments for excessive, redundant, unnecessary, or otherwise unreasonable work.
  3. Plaintiff was not entitled to a multiplier or fee enhancement because the reduced lodestar amount adequately compensated counsel under the circumstances.
  4. Plaintiff was entitled to $4,669.20 in taxable costs, but not to costs for certified copies of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, recording fees, or Federal Express expenses.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff qualified as a prevailing party entitled to attorneys' fees under the New Mexico Human Rights Act.
  2. What number of attorney and paralegal hours were reasonably expended and what hourly rates were reasonable under New Mexico law.
  3. Whether Plaintiff was entitled to a multiplier or fee enhancement in addition to the lodestar amount.
  4. Which litigation costs were taxable under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1), 28 U.S.C. § 1920, and applicable local law.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (26)

  • Chieftain Royalty Co. v. Enervest Energy Institutional Fund XIII-A, L.P., 888 F.3d 455, 461 (10th Cir. 2018)(followed)
  • Key v. Chrysler Motors Co., 998 P.2d 575, 581 (N.M. Ct. App. 2000)(followed)
  • Schroeder v. Memorial Medical Center, 945 P.2d 449, 451 (N.M. 1997)(followed)
  • Mountain Highlands, LLC v. Hendricks, No. Civ 08-0239 JB/ACT, 2010 WL 1631856, at *3–4 (D.N.M. Apr. 2, 2010)(followed)
  • Rivera-Platte v. First Colony Life Insurance Co., 173 P.3d 765, 791 (N.M. Ct. App. 2007)(followed)
  • In re New Mexico Indirect Purchasers Microsoft Corp. Antitrust Litigation, 149 P.3d 976, 1004 (N.M. Ct. App. 2007)(distinguished)
  • Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)(followed)
  • Calderon v. Navarette, 800 P.2d 1058, 1059–60 (N.M. 1990)(followed)
  • Xlear, Inc. v. Focus Nutrition, LLC, 893 F.3d 1227, 1233 (10th Cir. 2018)(followed)
  • Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 838 (2011)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 26.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…