Summary
The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico partially grants Plaintiff Ashley Imming’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs following a bench trial. Applying New Mexico law and the lodestar method, the Court awards $312,392.20 and reduces the requested hours and rates for redundant, excessive, or otherwise unreasonable work, while rejecting a requested fee multiplier.
Holdings
- Plaintiff was a prevailing party in a proceeding under the New Mexico Human Rights Act and was entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys' fees under N.M.S.A. § 28-1-13(D), including fees incurred in this federal collection action.
- Reasonable statutory attorneys' fees are calculated using the lodestar method, multiplying reasonably expended hours by reasonable hourly rates, with adjustments for excessive, redundant, unnecessary, or otherwise unreasonable work.
- Plaintiff was not entitled to a multiplier or fee enhancement because the reduced lodestar amount adequately compensated counsel under the circumstances.
- Plaintiff was entitled to $4,669.20 in taxable costs, but not to costs for certified copies of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, recording fees, or Federal Express expenses.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff qualified as a prevailing party entitled to attorneys' fees under the New Mexico Human Rights Act.
- What number of attorney and paralegal hours were reasonably expended and what hourly rates were reasonable under New Mexico law.
- Whether Plaintiff was entitled to a multiplier or fee enhancement in addition to the lodestar amount.
- Which litigation costs were taxable under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1), 28 U.S.C. § 1920, and applicable local law.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (26)
- Chieftain Royalty Co. v. Enervest Energy Institutional Fund XIII-A, L.P., 888 F.3d 455, 461 (10th Cir. 2018)(followed)
- Key v. Chrysler Motors Co., 998 P.2d 575, 581 (N.M. Ct. App. 2000)(followed)
- Schroeder v. Memorial Medical Center, 945 P.2d 449, 451 (N.M. 1997)(followed)
- Mountain Highlands, LLC v. Hendricks, No. Civ 08-0239 JB/ACT, 2010 WL 1631856, at *3–4 (D.N.M. Apr. 2, 2010)(followed)
- Rivera-Platte v. First Colony Life Insurance Co., 173 P.3d 765, 791 (N.M. Ct. App. 2007)(followed)
- In re New Mexico Indirect Purchasers Microsoft Corp. Antitrust Litigation, 149 P.3d 976, 1004 (N.M. Ct. App. 2007)(distinguished)
- Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)(followed)
- Calderon v. Navarette, 800 P.2d 1058, 1059–60 (N.M. 1990)(followed)
- Xlear, Inc. v. Focus Nutrition, LLC, 893 F.3d 1227, 1233 (10th Cir. 2018)(followed)
- Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 838 (2011)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 26.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…