Summary
The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico grants Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a remand in a Social Security disability-benefits case. The Court authorizes $37,656.00 in fees from past-due benefits and requires counsel to refund the previously awarded $6,800.00 Equal Access to Justice Act fee to Plaintiff.
Holdings
- The court may award a reasonable fee under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) after a remand followed by an award of past-due benefits, but the award may not exceed 25 percent of the claimant's past-due benefits.
- The requested $37,656 fee was reasonable and appropriate under § 406(b).
- Because counsel received both EAJA and § 406(b) fees, counsel must refund the lesser EAJA award of $6,800 to Plaintiff.
Questions Presented
- Whether the contingency-fee agreement and requested $37,656 attorney-fee award satisfied the requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).
- Whether the requested § 406(b) fee was reasonable in light of the representation, results achieved, delay, time spent, attorney experience, and effective hourly rate.
- Whether counsel was required to refund the lesser EAJA award after receiving fees under both EAJA and § 406(b).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (16)
- McGraw v. Barnhart, 450 F.3d 493, 496 (10th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Whitehead v. Richardson, 446 F.2d 126, 128 (6th Cir. 1971)(followed)
- Wrenn ex rel. Wrenn v. Astrue, 525 F.3d 931, 933-34 (10th Cir. 2008)(followed)
- Gisbrecht, 535 U.S. at 807-08(followed)
- Gordon v. Astrue, 361 F. App'x 933, 2-3 (10th Cir. 2010)(followed)
- McGuire v. Sullivan, 873 F.2d 974, 983 (7th Cir. 1989)(followed)
- Esperanza L. v. Colvin, No. 1:23-cv-00478-KRS, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9759, at *4, 2025 WL 212316 (D.N.M. Jan. 16, 2025)(followed)
- Audry R. v. Colvin, No. 1:22-cv-00474-KRS, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224434, at *4, 2024 WL 5076214 (D.N.M. Dec. 11, 2024)(followed)
- Ornelas v. O'Malley, No. 21-01031 KRS, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107388, at *4, 2024 WL 3045280 (D.N.M. June 17, 2024)(followed)
- Maldonado v. Kijakazi, No. 20-CV-01119-KRS, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158508, at *8, 2023 WL 5748757 (D.N.M. Sept. 6, 2023)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 16.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…