Nathan Speten et al. v. Sharda USA LLC et al.

Speten · United States District Court for the District of North Dakota · May 14, 2026 · No. 1:25-cv-00105

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of North Dakota denied motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction filed by Outsource Logistics, LLC and CJB Industries, Inc. The court held that specific personal jurisdiction existed over Outsource based on its shipment-related contacts with North Dakota and that CJB waived its jurisdictional defense by failing to adequately preserve it.

Holdings

  1. The court had specific personal jurisdiction over Outsource because the record, viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, established sufficient minimum contacts and a substantial connection between Outsource, North Dakota, and the claims arising from the allegedly mislabeled herbicide.
  2. CJB waived its personal-jurisdiction defense because it did not adequately preserve the defense in its first responsive pleading or a pre-pleading motion and did not provide timely notice that it intended to challenge personal jurisdiction.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court could exercise specific personal jurisdiction over Outsource based on its shipment, packaging, labeling, and knowledge concerning the allegedly defective herbicide sent into North Dakota.
  2. Whether CJB waived its personal-jurisdiction defense by denying jurisdictional allegations in its answer without expressly asserting lack of personal jurisdiction as an affirmative defense or raising it in a pre-pleading motion.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (18)

  • Viasystems, Inc. v. EMB-Papst St. Georgen GmbH & Co., KG, 646 F.3d 589, 592–93 (8th Cir. 2011)(followed)
  • Kulko v. Sup. Ct. of Cal., 436 U.S. 84, 91 (1978)(followed)
  • Creative Calling Sols., Inc. v. LF Beauty Ltd., 799 F.3d 975, 979 (8th Cir. 2015)(followed)
  • Hansen v. Scott, 2002 ND 101, ¶ 16, 645 N.W.2d 223(followed)
  • Johnson v. Woodcock, 444 F.3d 953, 955 (8th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Dever v. Hentzen Coatings, Inc., 380 F.3d 1070, 1073–74 (8th Cir. 2004)(followed)
  • Epps v. Stewart Info. Servs. Corp., 327 F.3d 642, 648 (8th Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • Helicopteros Nacionales de Columbia v. Hall, 466 U.S. 408, 415–16 (1984)(followed)
  • Romak USA, Inc. v. Rich, 384 F.3d 979, 984 (8th Cir. 2004)(followed)
  • JMAC Energy Srvs., LLC v. Badger Mining Corp., Case No. 1:24-cv-080, 2024 WL 5651829, at *4 (D.N.D. Dec. 12, 2024)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 18.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…