Jacob Leroy Ellis v. Douglas County Jail and Wellpath

Ellis · United States District Court for the District of Oregon · February 12, 2026 · No. 6:24-cv-01250-SB

Summary

The court granted Douglas County’s motion to dismiss a self-represented pretrial detainee’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims concerning dental care, Suboxone administration, and outdoor recreation. The court held that the complaint did not adequately allege municipal liability or objective deliberate indifference under the Fourteenth Amendment. The claims were dismissed with leave to amend by March 5, 2026.

Holdings

  1. A plaintiff seeking to impose § 1983 liability on a municipality must plead a deprivation of a constitutional right caused by an official policy, custom, practice, failure to train or supervise, or decision by a final policymaker, with the municipal action amounting to deliberate indifference and serving as the moving force behind the violation.
  2. Ellis failed to state a Fourteenth Amendment claim against the County based on inadequate treatment of his tooth infections because he did not allege a municipal policy, custom, or practice that caused the alleged constitutional violation.
  3. Ellis failed to state a Fourteenth Amendment claim based on the County's alleged administration of Suboxone because he did not plead facts showing that the practice placed him at substantial risk of serious harm, that the County failed to take reasonable available measures despite an objectively high degree of risk, or that the failure caused his injury.
  4. Ellis failed to state a Fourteenth Amendment claim based on insufficient outdoor exercise because he did not allege whether meaningful indoor recreational opportunities were available or unavailable.
  5. HIPAA does not provide a private right of action.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Ellis adequately pleaded a Fourteenth Amendment claim against the County based on allegedly inadequate treatment of his tooth infections.
  2. Whether Ellis adequately pleaded a Fourteenth Amendment claim based on the County's alleged policy or practice of administering Suboxone improperly.
  3. Whether Ellis adequately pleaded a Fourteenth Amendment claim based on allegedly insufficient outdoor exercise.
  4. Whether Ellis stated a private claim under HIPAA.
  5. Whether the County could be held municipally liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (32)

  • Hebrard v. Nofziger, 90 F.4th 1000, 1004 n.1 (9th Cir. 2024)(followed)
  • Hoeft v. Tucson Unified School District, 967 F.2d 1298, 1301 n.2 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
  • Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 556, 570 (2007)(followed)
  • Sernas v. Cantrell, 857 F. App'x 400, 401 (9th Cir. 2021)(followed)
  • Seals v. L.A. Unified School District, 797 F. App'x 327, 327 (9th Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Draper v. Coombs, 792 F.2d 915, 924 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • Owen v. City of Hemet, No. 21-55240, 2022 WL 16945887, at *1 (9th Cir. Nov. 15, 2022)(followed)
  • Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • Litmon v. Harris, 768 F.3d 1237, 1241 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 32.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…