Ron S. McCray v. Joel Anderson, Elisabeth Holcomb, Dr. McRee, and Dr. Ringold

No. 8:25-cv-11451 (D.S.C. Mar. 13, 2026) · United States District Court for the District of South Carolina · March 13, 2026 · No. 8:25-cv-11451

Summary

This Report and Recommendation addresses Plaintiff Ron S. McCray’s Third Motion for Default Judgment in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against South Carolina correctional officials and medical personnel. The magistrate judge recommends denying the motion because no clerk’s entry of default had been obtained, the served defendants timely answered, and Defendant Holcomb had not yet been served.

Holdings

  1. Default judgment is improper because the served Defendants filed timely Answers to the Amended Complaint, and no Defendant is in default.
  2. Default judgment cannot be entered against a defendant who has not been served.
  3. Entry of default by the Clerk is a procedural prerequisite to a motion for default judgment.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether default judgment should be entered against Defendants Anderson, McRee, and Ringold who filed timely Answers.
  2. Whether default judgment should be entered against Defendant Holcomb who has not been served.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (8)

  • Broadbent v. Mitchell, C/A No. 0:09-cv-1616-CMC-PJG, 2009 WL 3698131 (D.S.C. Nov. 3, 2009)
  • Hudson v. State of N.C., 158 F.R.D. 78 (E.D.N.C. 1994)
  • Traber v. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc., 2012 WL 3039714 (W.D.N.C. July 25, 2012)
  • Randolph v. S. Cent. Reg'l Jail, 2021 WL 4530065 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 10, 2021)
  • Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310 (4th Cir. 2005)
  • Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985)
  • Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1985)
  • United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir. 1984)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…