VonEric Primus v. Ms. Allen

Primus · United States District Court for the District of South Carolina · February 17, 2026 · No. 8:25-cv-01958-DCC

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina granted Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in VonEric Primus’s Bivens action concerning alleged inadequate medical care. The Court held that Plaintiff failed to properly exhaust administrative remedies and, alternatively, that his claim arose in a new Bivens context for which special factors counseled against extending a damages remedy. The Court also addressed sovereign immunity, qualified immunity, and injunctive relief.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff failed to properly comply with the grievance procedure, which was a prerequisite to filing suit.
  2. Plaintiff's inadequate-medical-care claim arose in a new Bivens context, and special factors counseled against extending a Bivens damages remedy.
  3. Sovereign immunity barred plaintiff's claim against defendant in her official capacity.
  4. Qualified immunity barred plaintiff's individual-capacity claim because plaintiff did not state a constitutional violation.
  5. Plaintiff was not entitled to injunctive relief.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether summary judgment was appropriate because plaintiff failed to properly exhaust available administrative remedies before filing suit.
  2. Whether plaintiff's alleged inadequate-medical-care claim arose in a new Bivens context and, if so, whether special factors counseled against extending a Bivens damages remedy.
  3. Whether sovereign immunity barred plaintiff's official-capacity claim.
  4. Whether qualified immunity barred plaintiff's individual-capacity claim because he failed to allege a constitutional violation.
  5. Whether plaintiff was entitled to injunctive relief concerning prison conditions.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (10)

  • Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1999)(followed)
  • Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261 (1976)(followed)
  • Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Mentavlos v. Anderson, 249 F.3d 301, 310 (4th Cir. 2001)(applied)
  • Davis v. Passman, 442 U.S. 228 (1979)(followed)
  • Carlson v. Green, 446 U.S. 14 (1980)(distinguished)
  • Ziglar v. Abbasi, 137 S. Ct. 1843, 1857-59 (2017)(followed)
  • Bulger v. Hurwitz, 62 F.4th 127, 137-42 (4th Cir. 2023)(followed)
  • Morrison v. Holding, 539 F. App'x 272, 273 (4th Cir. 2013)(followed)
  • Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 (1982)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…