Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Mareisha Dye, Angela Simpson, Maurice Caldwell, and Desmond McClurkin

Dye · United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Rock Hill Division · May 8, 2026 · No. 0:25-cv-12670-JDA

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina grants Progressive Direct Insurance Company’s consent motion for judgment on the pleadings against Maurice Caldwell and Desmond McClurkin and its motion for default judgment against Mareisha Dye and Angela Simpson. The court holds that Simpson’s material misrepresentation entitled Progressive to rescind the automobile insurance policy. It further concludes that, even absent rescission, the policy provided no coverage for the accident and imposed no duty to defend or indemnify the relevant parties.

Holdings

  1. Default judgment was proper because Dye and Simpson failed to plead or otherwise defend, and the well-pleaded allegations, deemed admitted by their default, established Progressive's entitlement to the requested declaratory relief.
  2. Judgment on the pleadings was proper because Caldwell and McClurkin admitted the complaint's allegations, no material issue of fact remained, and Progressive was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
  3. Progressive was entitled to rescind or void the policy because Simpson omitted the vehicle from her insurance application, constituting a misrepresentation concerning a material fact or circumstance within the policy's voiding provision.
  4. The policy did not provide liability coverage to Caldwell or McClurkin and imposed no duty on Progressive to defend or indemnify Simpson or Mareisha for claims arising from the accident. This result applied independently of the policy's rescission because Mareisha was not an insured person and the vehicle was not a covered auto.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether default judgment was proper against Mareisha Dye and Angela Simpson based on their failure to respond and the well-pleaded allegations of the complaint.
  2. Whether judgment on the pleadings was proper against Maurice Caldwell and Desmond McClurkin after they admitted the allegations of the complaint.
  3. Whether Simpson's alleged material misrepresentation or omission on the insurance application entitled Progressive to rescind or void the policy.
  4. Whether the policy provided liability coverage or imposed a duty to defend or indemnify any defendant for claims arising from the accident.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (7)

  • United States v. Clark, No. 3:17-cv-03440-JMC, 2019 WL 1122933, at *1 (D.S.C. Mar. 12, 2019)(followed)
  • Mey v. Phillips, 71 F.4th 203, 223 (4th Cir. 2023)(followed)
  • Rollins Ranches, LLC v. Watson, No. 0:18-cv-03278-SAL, 2021 WL 5355650, at *3 (D.S.C. Nov. 17, 2021)(followed)
  • Pa. Nat'l Mut. Cas. Ins. v. Beach Mart, Inc., 932 F.3d 268, 274 (4th Cir. 2019)(followed)
  • Integon Gen. Ins. v. Bartkowiak ex rel. Bartkowiak, No. 7:09-cv-03045-JMC, 2010 WL 4156471, at *2 (D.S.C. Oct. 19, 2010)(followed)
  • Lewis v. Excel Mech., LLC, No. 2:13-cv-281-PMD, 2013 WL 4585873, at *2 (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 2013)(followed)
  • Burbach Broad. Co. of Del. v. Elkins Radio Corp., 278 F.3d 401, 405-06 (4th Cir. 2002)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…