Summary
The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina adopts, as modified, a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation concerning a pro se pretrial detainee’s petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court dismisses the petition without prejudice and without requiring the respondent to file a return, and declines to issue a certificate of appealability.
Holdings
- When a party fails to file timely and specific objections to a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court need not conduct de novo review and need only determine whether the record contains clear error before adopting the recommendation.
- The court would not adopt the recommendation to dismiss based on Petitioner's failure to bring the case into proper form because the proper-form order had been returned as undeliverable.
- The Petition was dismissed without prejudice and without requiring Respondent to file a return.
- A certificate of appealability should not issue because Petitioner failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
Questions Presented
- What standard of review applies when a party fails to file specific objections to a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation?
- Whether the Petition should be dismissed without prejudice without requiring Respondent to file a return.
- Whether dismissal could properly rest on Petitioner's failure to bring the case into proper form when the proper-form order had been returned as undeliverable.
- Whether a certificate of appealability should issue.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (16)
- Wimmer v. Cook, 774 F.2d 68, 72 (4th Cir. 1985)(followed)
- Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270–71 (1976)(followed)
- Farmer v. McBride, 177 Fed. App’x 327, 330–31 (4th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982)(followed)
- Elijah v. Dunbar, 66 F.4th 454, 460 (4th Cir. 2023)(followed)
- United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 622 (4th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Lockert v. Faulkner, 843 F.2d 1015, 1019 (7th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Greenspan v. Bros. Prop. Corp., 103 F. Supp. 3d 734, 737 (D.S.C. 2015)(followed)
- Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199–200 (4th Cir. 1983)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 16.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…