Monarchy Rush No More RV Resort, LLC v. Black Hills Title, Inc.; ECM Parks and Recreation, Inc.

Monarchy Rush · United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, Western Division · March 24, 2026 · No. 5:24-CV-05035-CBK

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of South Dakota granted Black Hills Title, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment on Monarchy Rush No More RV Resort, LLC's breach-of-fiduciary-duty claim arising from the release of an earnest-money deposit. The court held that the parties' amended stock-purchase agreements made the deposit irrevocable and forfeitable when the buyer failed to close, and that no genuine dispute of material fact existed regarding the buyer's lack of contractual entitlement to the funds. The court also authorized Black Hills and ECM Parks and Recreation, Inc. to seek attorney fees and costs under the agreement and stated that the third-party action was moot.

Holdings

  1. Summary judgment was warranted because there was no genuine dispute of material fact and plaintiff could not establish as a matter of law that Black Hills breached a fiduciary duty or caused plaintiff's damages.
  2. Black Hills did not breach its fiduciary duty by releasing the $57,000 earnest-money deposit to ECM because the final amended agreements required that result when plaintiff failed to complete the purchase by the closing deadline.
  3. Plaintiff could not use a later affidavit to create a material factual dispute by asserting facts contrary to its agent's prior deposition testimony.
  4. The contractual indemnity provision authorized Black Hills and ECM to seek attorney fees and costs from plaintiff after prevailing.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether genuine disputes of material fact precluded summary judgment on plaintiff's breach-of-fiduciary-duty claim against Black Hills.
  2. Whether Black Hills breached its fiduciary duty by releasing the earnest-money deposit to ECM rather than returning it to plaintiff.
  3. Whether the contractual attorney-fee and cost provision entitled Black Hills and ECM to seek fees and costs from plaintiff.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (16)

  • Johnson v. Schulte Hosp. Grp., Inc., 66 F.4th 1110, 1113-14 (8th Cir. 2023)(followed)
  • Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042 (8th Cir. 2011)(followed)
  • Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 252 (1986)(followed)
  • Arnett v. Norris, 160 F.4th 921, 925 (8th Cir. 2025)(followed)
  • Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557, 586 (2009)(followed)
  • Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586 (1986)(followed)
  • National Bank of Commerce v. Dow Chemical Co., 165 F.3d 602, 607 (8th Cir. 1999)(followed)
  • Uhiren v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Inc., 346 F.3d 824, 827 (8th Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • MBI Oil & Gas, LLC v. Royalty Interests Partnership, LP, 146 F.4th 650, 655 (8th Cir. 2025)(followed)
  • Redlin v. First Interstate Bank, 2 N.W.3d 729, 734 (S.D. 2024)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 16.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…